Dmitry Adamushko wrote: >>> Hi Ingo, >>> >>> I found an issue about the scheduler. >>> If you need a test case, please let me know. >>> Here is a patch. >>> [ ... ] >>> The new thread should be valid scheduler class before queuing. >>> This patch fixes to set the suitable scheduler class. >> Nice fix! It's a 2.6.23 must-have fix - i'll push it out into the >> scheduler tree. Thanks! > > I think, the following approach would be a bit more appropriate > (the missing addition to the already existing "don't leak PI boosting prio"): > > (not tested) > Thank you for reviewing my patch. Yes, your approach looks better than mine. I've tested it and it looks working fine in my test case. I attached the test case.
Will you write a patch to replace mine? Thanks, Hiroshi Shimamoto
<<inline: mutexprio.c>>
