> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] net: dsa: microchip: avoid hard-codded port count > > Use port_cnt value to disable interrupts on switch reset. > > Signed-off-by: Razvan Stefanescu <razvan.stefane...@microchip.com> > --- > drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c > b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c > index 187be42de5f1..54fc05595d48 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477.c > @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static int ksz9477_reset_switch(struct ksz_device > *dev) > > /* disable interrupts */ > ksz_write32(dev, REG_SW_INT_MASK__4, SWITCH_INT_MASK); > - ksz_write32(dev, REG_SW_PORT_INT_MASK__4, 0x7F); > + ksz_write32(dev, REG_SW_PORT_INT_MASK__4, dev->port_cnt); > ksz_read32(dev, REG_SW_PORT_INT_STATUS__4, &data32); > > /* set broadcast storm protection 10% rate */
The register value is a portmap, so using port_cnt may be wrong. The chip is a 7-port switch. There is a 6-port variant, but it is okay to write 0x7F. There is also a 3-port variant which uses a different design. It is a bit of stretch to use 0x7F on it. It is more a code readability or correctness than incorrect hardware operation.