On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 12:00:02AM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghan...@amd.com>
>
> Future AMD systems will support "Asymmetric" Dual-Rank DIMMs. These are
> DIMMs where the ranks are of different sizes.
>
> The even rank will use the Primary Even Chip Select registers and the
> odd rank will use the Secondary Odd Chip Select registers.
>
> Recognize if a Secondary Odd Chip Select is being used. Use the
> Secondary Odd Address Mask when calculating the chip select size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghan...@amd.com>
> ---
> Link:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190709215643.171078-8-yazen.ghan...@amd.com
>
> v2->v3:
> * Add check of csrow_nr before using secondary mask.
>
> v1->v2:
> * No change.
>
> drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
> index 26ce48fcaf00..4d1e6daa7ec4 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
> @@ -790,9 +790,13 @@ static void debug_dump_dramcfg_low(struct amd64_pvt
> *pvt, u32 dclr, int chan)
>
> #define CS_EVEN_PRIMARY BIT(0)
> #define CS_ODD_PRIMARY BIT(1)
> +#define CS_EVEN_SECONDARY BIT(2)
> +#define CS_ODD_SECONDARY BIT(3)
>
> -#define CS_EVEN CS_EVEN_PRIMARY
> -#define CS_ODD CS_ODD_PRIMARY
> +#define CS_EVEN (CS_EVEN_PRIMARY | CS_EVEN_SECONDARY)
> +#define CS_ODD (CS_ODD_PRIMARY | CS_EVEN_SECONDARY)
That's just my urge to have stuff ballanced but shouldn't that last line be:
#define CS_ODD (CS_ODD_PRIMARY | CS_ODD_SECONDARY)
i.e., not have "even" as in CS_EVEN_SECONDARY in there but only "odd"s? :)
> +#define csrow_sec_enabled(i, dct, pvt)
> ((pvt)->csels[(dct)].csbases_sec[(i)] & DCSB_CS_ENABLE)
I moved that to the header, under csrow_enabled().
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
