On 08/12, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 06:37:10PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 08/11, Adrian Reber wrote: > > > > > > include/linux/pid.h | 2 +- > > > include/linux/sched/task.h | 1 + > > > include/uapi/linux/sched.h | 1 + > > > kernel/fork.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- > > > kernel/pid.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > > 5 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > Looks good to me... > > > > A couple of nits below, but I won't insist, feel free to ignore. > > > > > +/* > > > + * Different sizes of struct clone_args > > > + */ > > > +#define CLONE3_ARGS_SIZE_V0 64 > > > > I don't really understand why do we want the "size < CLONE3_ARGS_SIZE_V0" > > check in copy_clone_args_from_user(), but I won't argue. > > To make sure a user can't give us a garbage sized struct that is smaller > than the initial version of the struct.
But why do we want to detect this case? And why CLONE3_ARGS_SIZE_V0 is special? Oleg.