On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:50:22 +0200 (CEST) Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > This is ridiculous, I asked you multiple times to explain to me > > > some of the differences relative to CFS as response to the splitup > > > requests. Not once did you react, you didn't even ask what I'd > > > like to know specifically. > > > > Roman, > > > > this is... a strange comment. It almost sounds like you were holding > > the splitup hostage depending on some other thing happening.... > > that's not a good attitude in my book. Having big-blob patches that > > do many things at the same time leads to them being impossible to > > apply. Linux works by having smaller incrementals. You know that; > > you've been around for a long time. > > There is actually a very simple reason for that, the actual patch is > not my primary focus, for someone who's not focused on patches/code, you make quite a bit of noise when someone does turn your discussion into smaller patches and only credits you three times. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
