On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:50:12 +0200 (CEST) Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You never directly replied to these pretty explicit requests, all > > you did was this side remark 5 days later in one of your patch > > announcements: > > This is ridiculous, I asked you multiple times to explain to me some > of the differences relative to CFS as response to the splitup > requests. Not once did you react, you didn't even ask what I'd like > to know specifically.
Roman, this is... a strange comment. It almost sounds like you were holding the splitup hostage depending on some other thing happening.... that's not a good attitude in my book. Having big-blob patches that do many things at the same time leads to them being impossible to apply. Linux works by having smaller incrementals. You know that; you've been around for a long time. Complaining that someone finally did splitup work after you refused, and even puts credit in for you... that's beyond my comprehension. Sorry. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
