On 8/1/2019 1:05 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
A future patch is going to change semantics of clk_register() so that
clk_hw::init is guaranteed to be NULL after a clk is registered. Avoid
referencing this member here so that we don't run into NULL pointer
exceptions.

Cc: Taniya Das <t...@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agr...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sb...@kernel.org>


Acked-by: Taniya Das <t...@codeaurora.org>

---

Please ack so I can take this through clk tree

  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
index c3fd632af119..7a8a84dcb70d 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
@@ -396,6 +396,7 @@ static int clk_rpmh_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        hw_clks = desc->clks;
for (i = 0; i < desc->num_clks; i++) {
+               const char *name = hw_clks[i]->init->name;
                u32 res_addr;
                size_t aux_data_len;
                const struct bcm_db *data;
@@ -426,8 +427,7 @@ static int clk_rpmh_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ret = devm_clk_hw_register(&pdev->dev, hw_clks[i]);
                if (ret) {
-                       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register %s\n",
-                               hw_clks[i]->init->name);
+                       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register %s\n", name);
                        return ret;
                }
        }


--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.

--

Reply via email to