On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 05:54, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi all.
> 
> Commit 831441862956fffa17b9801db37e6ea1650b0f69 (Freezer: make kernel threads
> nonfreezable by default) breaks freezing when attempting to resume from an
> initrd, because the init (which is freezeable) spins while waiting for another
> thread to run /linuxrc, but doesn't check whether it has been told to enter
> the refrigerator.

Hm.

I use a resume from an initrd on a regular basis and it works without the patch
below.

I think we need to investigate what happens in your test case a bit.

> The original patch replaced a call to try_to_freeze() with a 
> call to yield(). I believe a simple reversion is wrong because
> if !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP, try_to_freeze() is a noop. It should still yield.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nigel Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
>  do_mounts_initrd.c |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> diff -ruNp 952-fix-initrd-resume.patch-old/init/do_mounts_initrd.c 
> 952-fix-initrd-resume.patch-new/init/do_mounts_initrd.c
> --- 952-fix-initrd-resume.patch-old/init/do_mounts_initrd.c   2007-09-11 
> 13:43:31.000000000 +1000
> +++ 952-fix-initrd-resume.patch-new/init/do_mounts_initrd.c   2007-09-11 
> 13:19:50.000000000 +1000
> @@ -58,8 +58,10 @@ static void __init handle_initrd(void)
>  
>       pid = kernel_thread(do_linuxrc, "/linuxrc", SIGCHLD);
>       if (pid > 0)
> -             while (pid != sys_wait4(-1, NULL, 0, NULL))
> +             while (pid != sys_wait4(-1, NULL, 0, NULL)) {
>                       yield();
> +                     try_to_freeze();
> +             }
>  
>       if (!resume_attempted)
>               printk(KERN_ERR "Suspend2: No attempt was made to resume from "
> 

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to