Hi again. On Tuesday 11 September 2007 21:55:06 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 13:27, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Tuesday 11 September 2007 21:04:22 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Tuesday, 11 September 2007 05:54, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > > > Hi all. > > > > > > > > Commit 831441862956fffa17b9801db37e6ea1650b0f69 (Freezer: make kernel > > threads > > > > nonfreezable by default) breaks freezing when attempting to resume from an > > > > initrd, because the init (which is freezeable) spins while waiting for > > another > > > > thread to run /linuxrc, but doesn't check whether it has been told to > > enter > > > > the refrigerator. > > > > > > Hm. > > > > > > I use a resume from an initrd on a regular basis and it works without the > > patch > > > below. > > > > > > I think we need to investigate what happens in your test case a bit. > > > > Ah. That makes me realise that I see that too - my AMD64 uniprocessor laptop > > didn't need the patch (guess that's why I didn't notice the need and ack'd > > the patch). But my x86 SMP machine... it needs this. I'll see if they're > > running on different processors. > > Well, strange. My x86_64 SMP machines don't need the patch too.
Oh well. I'm probably doing something wrong then and haven't clicked yet. Regards, Nigel -- See http://www.tuxonice.net for Howtos, FAQs, mailing lists, wiki and bugzilla info. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
