On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 06:00:57PM +0100, James Pearson wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >Anton Arapov wrote:
> >
> >> Hey guys, the future of this patch is important for me. What do you
> >>think, has this patch any chances to be committed to upstream?
> >>
> >>James Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >>>H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >>>There isn't that much that is duplicated - and there are also bits of
> >>>the /proc/PID/mem code that are not needed in this case, so I'm not
> >>>really sure if it is worth doing.
> >>>
> >>>I did submit a patch a few months ago - see:
> >>>
> >>><http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117862109623007&w=2>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Looks reasonable to me, except for the one overlong line.
> >
>
> OK, here is the patch (without the long line) against 2.6.23-rc5 - what
> else needs to be done to get it committed?
Remove duplicate ptrace_may_attach() checks, unecessary (), {} and
spaces before pointer names -- char *buf.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
