On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:55:52PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > On 01-Jul 11:02, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Some of the things we could tie to this would be: > > > > - select_idle_siblings; -nice would scan more than +nice, > > Just to be sure, you are not proposing to use the nice value we > already have, i.e. > p->{static,normal}_prio > but instead a new similar concept, right? Correct; a new sched_attr::sched_latency_nice value, which is like sched_nice, but controls a different dimmension of behaviour.