On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 11:06:38 +0200
Fabien Lahoudere <fabien.lahoud...@collabora.com> wrote:

> Embedded controller return minimum and maximum frequencies, unfortunately
> we have no way to know the step for all available frequencies.
> Even if not complete, we can return a list of known values using the
> standard read_avail callback (IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ) to provide them to
> userland.
> 
> Now cros_ec_* sensors provides frequencies values in sysfs like this:
> "0 min max".
> 
> 0 is always true to disable the sensor.

Hmm. 0 frequency feels like a kind of non standard use of the ABI.
I suppose it's fairly logical and it does no harm if userspace never uses
it so I guess we can let this use in without updating the docs.

I'd like some feedback from the chromeos side on whether this is a sensible
way of representing things?  Note that generic userspace will only pick
one of those values, it won't magically decide to go for somewhere inbetween.

Jonathan

> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabien Lahoudere <fabien.lahoud...@collabora.com>
> ---
>  .../cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c    | 22 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h   |  4 +++-
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c 
> b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> index 2ce077b576a4..8df82b675752 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #include <linux/iio/buffer.h>
>  #include <linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h>
>  #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> +#include <linux/iio/sysfs.h>
>  #include <linux/iio/kfifo_buf.h>
>  #include <linux/iio/trigger_consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/iio/triggered_buffer.h>
> @@ -86,6 +87,26 @@ static int cros_ec_get_host_cmd_version_mask(struct 
> cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int cros_ec_read_avail(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> +                           struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> +                           const int **vals,
> +                           int *type,
> +                           int *length,
> +                           long mask)
> +{
> +     struct cros_ec_sensors_core_state *state = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +
> +     switch (mask) {
> +     case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> +             *length = 3;
> +             *vals = (const int *)&state->frequency_range;
> +             *type = IIO_VAL_INT;
> +             return IIO_AVAIL_LIST;
> +     }
> +
> +     return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
>  int cros_ec_sensors_core_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>                             int num_channels,
>                             bool physical_device)
> @@ -161,6 +182,7 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_core_init(struct platform_device 
> *pdev,
>               }
>       }
>  
> +     state->info.read_avail = cros_ec_read_avail;
>       indio_dev->info = &state->info;
>  
>       /* Timestamp channel */
> diff --git a/include/linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h 
> b/include/linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h
> index 89937ad242ef..5fa9ba5332e0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors_core.h
> @@ -140,7 +140,9 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_core_register(struct platform_device 
> *pdev,
>       channel[idx].scan_type.shift = 0;\
>       channel[idx].scan_index = idx;\
>       channel[idx].ext_info = cros_ec_sensors_ext_info;\
> -     channel[idx].scan_type.sign = 'u';
> +     channel[idx].scan_type.sign = 'u';\
> +     channel[idx].info_mask_shared_by_all_available = \
> +             BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ);
>  
>  /**
>   * cros_ec_motion_send_host_cmd() - send motion sense host command

Reply via email to