On 17-Jun-2019 10:51:27 AM, Aubrey Li wrote: > The result looks still unfair, and particularly, the variance is too high,
I just want to confirm that I am also seeing the same issue with a similar setup. I also tried with the priority boost fix we previously posted, the results are slightly better, but we are still seeing a very high variance. On average, the results I get for 10 30-seconds runs are still much better than nosmt (both sysbench pinned on the same sibling) for the memory benchmark, and pretty similar for the CPU benchmark, but the high variance between runs is indeed concerning. Still digging :-) Thanks, Julien
