On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 10:10:22PM +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> When truncating a file, file buffers which have already been allocated but
> not yet written may be truncated. Truncating these buffers could cause
> breakage of a sequential write pattern in a block group if the truncated
> blocks are for example followed by blocks allocated to another file. To
> avoid this problem, always wait for write out of all unwritten buffers
> before proceeding with the truncate execution.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.a...@wdc.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index 89542c19d09e..4e8c7921462f 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -5137,6 +5137,17 @@ static int btrfs_setsize(struct inode *inode, struct
> iattr *attr)
> btrfs_end_write_no_snapshotting(root);
> btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
> } else {
> + struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
> +
> + if (btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, HMZONED)) {
> + u64 sectormask = fs_info->sectorsize - 1;
> +
> + ret = btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode,
> + newsize & (~sectormask),
> + (u64)-1);
Use ALIGN(). Thanks,
Josef
