On 5/31/19 4:47 AM, Mihai Moldovan wrote: > * On 5/30/19 9:51 PM, Jon Maloy wrote: >> Make sure the following three commits are present in TIPC *after* the >> offending commit: >> >> commit 532b0f7ece4c "tipc: fix modprobe tipc failed after switch order of >> device registration" > > This *is* the offending commit, as far as I understand. Merely rebased in > linux-stable, and hence having a different SHA, but mentioning the original > SHA > (i.e., 532b0f7ece4c) in its commit message. > > >> Since that patch one was flawed it had to be reverted: >> commit 5593530e5694 ""Revert tipc: fix modprobe tipc failed after switch >> order of device registration" >> >> It was then replaced with this one: >> commit 526f5b851a96 "tipc: fix modprobe tipc failed after switch order of >> device registration" > > Okay, these two are not part of 5.1.5. I've backported them (and only these > two) > to 5.1.5 and the issue(s) seem to be gone. Definitely something that should be > backported to/included in 5.1.6. > > > Thanks for pointing all that out! Unfortunately I didn't add anything useful > but > noise, since you obviously already knew, that this commit was broken. I'd urge > Greg to release a new stable version including the fixes soon, if possible, > though, for not being able to start/use userspace browsers sounds like a > pretty > bad regression to me. >
Not only commit 526f5b851a96 )("tipc: fix modprobe tipc failed after switch order of device registration") has to be reverted, but also I found commit 7e27e8d6130c ("tipc: switch order of device registration to fix a crash") introduced a serious regression which makes tipc internal topology service server failed to be created. Today I will fix it with the following approaches: 1. Revert commit 7e27e8d6130c ("tipc: switch order of device registration to fix a crash") 2. Use another method to solve the problem that commit 7e27e8d6130c tries to fix. Thanks, Ying > > > Mihai >