On 27/05/19 12:37 PM, Brian Masney wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 03:58:19PM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
>> I attached a patch that shows how I was able to determine what had
>> already claimed the host.
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 10:48:24AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> This is because SDHCI is using the IRQ thread to process the SDIO card
>> interrupt (sdio_run_irqs()).  When the card driver tries to use the card, it
>> causes interrupts which deadlocks since c07a48c26519 ("mmc: sdhci: Remove
>> finish_tasklet") has moved the tasklet processing to the IRQ thread.
>>
>> I would expect to be able to use the IRQ thread to complete requests, and it
>> is desirable to do so because it is lower latency.
>>
>> Probably, SDHCI should use sdio_signal_irq() which queues a work item, and
>> is what other drivers are doing.
>>
>> I will investigate some more and send a patch.

Please try the patch below:

From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 14:45:55 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: Fix SDIO IRQ thread deadlock

Since commit c07a48c26519 ("mmc: sdhci: Remove finish_tasklet"), the IRQ
thread might be used to complete requests, but the IRQ thread is also used
to process SDIO card interrupts. This can cause a deadlock when the SDIO
processing tries to access the card since that would also require the IRQ
thread. Change SDHCI to use sdio_signal_irq() to schedule a work item
instead. That also requires implementing the ->ack_sdio_irq() mmc host op.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hun...@intel.com>
Fixes: c07a48c26519 ("mmc: sdhci: Remove finish_tasklet")
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 97158344b862..0cd5f2ce98df 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -2137,6 +2137,17 @@ void sdhci_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int 
enable)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdhci_enable_sdio_irq);
 
+static void sdhci_ack_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc)
+{
+       struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
+       unsigned long flags;
+
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
+       if (host->flags & SDHCI_SDIO_IRQ_ENABLED)
+               sdhci_enable_sdio_irq_nolock(host, true);
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
+}
+
 int sdhci_start_signal_voltage_switch(struct mmc_host *mmc,
                                      struct mmc_ios *ios)
 {
@@ -2585,6 +2596,7 @@ static const struct mmc_host_ops sdhci_ops = {
        .get_ro         = sdhci_get_ro,
        .hw_reset       = sdhci_hw_reset,
        .enable_sdio_irq = sdhci_enable_sdio_irq,
+       .ack_sdio_irq    = sdhci_ack_sdio_irq,
        .start_signal_voltage_switch    = sdhci_start_signal_voltage_switch,
        .prepare_hs400_tuning           = sdhci_prepare_hs400_tuning,
        .execute_tuning                 = sdhci_execute_tuning,
@@ -3087,8 +3099,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
                if ((intmask & SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT) &&
                    (host->ier & SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT)) {
                        sdhci_enable_sdio_irq_nolock(host, false);
-                       host->thread_isr |= SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT;
-                       result = IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
+                       sdio_signal_irq(host->mmc);
                }
 
                intmask &= ~(SDHCI_INT_CARD_INSERT | SDHCI_INT_CARD_REMOVE |
@@ -3160,15 +3171,6 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_thread_irq(int irq, void 
*dev_id)
                mmc_detect_change(mmc, msecs_to_jiffies(200));
        }
 
-       if (isr & SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT) {
-               sdio_run_irqs(host->mmc);
-
-               spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
-               if (host->flags & SDHCI_SDIO_IRQ_ENABLED)
-                       sdhci_enable_sdio_irq_nolock(host, true);
-               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
-       }
-
        return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to