Hello, On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:48 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > [ Upstream commit 2663147dc7465cb29040a05cc4286fdd839978b5 ] > > New pt_regs should indicate that there's no syscall, not that there's > syscall #0. While at it wrap macro body in do/while and parenthesize > macro arguments. > > Signed-off-by: Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org> > --- > arch/xtensa/include/asm/processor.h | 21 ++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
This patch should not be taken to any of the stable trees, except maybe 5.0.y, because NO_SYSCALL was introduced to arch/xtensa in 5.0. This patch doesn't have any cc:stable tags, I'm curious why was it chosen for stable and what can I do to prevent that in the future? -- Thanks. -- Max
