From: Jeff Layton <jlay...@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 4b8222870032715f9d995f3eb7c7acd8379a275d ]

It's possible for us to issue a lookup to revalidate a dentry
concurrently with a rename. If done in the right order, then we could
end up processing dentry info in the reply that no longer reflects the
state of the dentry.

If req->r_dentry->d_name differs from the one in the trace, then just
ignore the trace in the reply. We only need to do this however if the
parent's i_rwsem is not held.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlay...@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: "Yan, Zheng" <z...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryo...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 fs/ceph/inode.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ceph/inode.c b/fs/ceph/inode.c
index 9d1f34d46627..5880ee20ada4 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/inode.c
@@ -1152,6 +1152,19 @@ static int splice_dentry(struct dentry **pdn, struct 
inode *in)
        return 0;
 }
 
+static int d_name_cmp(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name, size_t len)
+{
+       int ret;
+
+       /* take d_lock to ensure dentry->d_name stability */
+       spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
+       ret = dentry->d_name.len - len;
+       if (!ret)
+               ret = memcmp(dentry->d_name.name, name, len);
+       spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+       return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Incorporate results into the local cache.  This is either just
  * one inode, or a directory, dentry, and possibly linked-to inode (e.g.,
@@ -1401,7 +1414,8 @@ int ceph_fill_trace(struct super_block *sb, struct 
ceph_mds_request *req)
                err = splice_dentry(&req->r_dentry, in);
                if (err < 0)
                        goto done;
-       } else if (rinfo->head->is_dentry) {
+       } else if (rinfo->head->is_dentry &&
+                  !d_name_cmp(req->r_dentry, rinfo->dname, rinfo->dname_len)) {
                struct ceph_vino *ptvino = NULL;
 
                if ((le32_to_cpu(rinfo->diri.in->cap.caps) & 
CEPH_CAP_FILE_SHARED) ||
-- 
2.20.1

Reply via email to