Thanks for review. On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 00:54, Bart Van Assche <bvanass...@acm.org> wrote: > > This is the most important change in this patch. Using the title "Remove > __cq_empty()" > for this patch is misleading because the above patch does something else, > namely changing > the return type of __cq_dequeue() from int into a pointer. Should this patch > perhaps be > split or should the __cq_empty() removal be left out from this patch?
I actually hesitated whether _cq_full() should be inlined as well. Having said that, let me keep both of them and just change the return type of __cq_dequeue(). Thanks, Yuyang
