On (03/13/19 18:27), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > Does this mean we keep irq_work part or we bury it and solve it by other
> > means?
>
> That's a very good question. Because if we add console_trylock()
> to printk(), then we can't invoke ->atomic() consoles when console_sem
> is already locked, because one of the registered drivers is currently
> being modified by a 3rd party and printk(), thus, must stay away.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
one of the drivers or the list itself.
-ss
