Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block error)

[Chris Mason]

On Saturday, December 23, 2000 11:02:53 -0800 Linus Torvalds
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Which is why I prefer the higher layers handling the dirty/uptodate/xxx
> bits. 
> 

Grin, I should have taken the hint when we talked about the buffer up to
date checks for block_read_full_page, it made sense then too.  

brw_page doesn't clear the dirty bit in pre4, was that on purpose?

-chris

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/