On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Chris Mason wrote: > > I've updated to test13-pre4, and removed the hunk for submit_bh. > Looks as though pre4 changed the submit_bh callers to clear the dirty > bit, so my code does the same. Basically, I wanted to think of "submit_bh()" as a pure IO thing. When we call submit_bh(), that is basically the same as "statr IO on this thing". Which implies to me that submit_bh() doesn't care, or know, about why the higher layers did this. Which is why I prefer the higher layers handling the dirty/uptodate/xxx bits. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block erro... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_b... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_b... Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_b... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12... Daniel Phillips
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was T... Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (w... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.... Chris Mason