On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:24:45AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > And because it's one of _those_ days, I forgot to include one patch... > > --- > Subject: x86/percpu: Optimize raw_cpu_xchg() > From: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> > Date: Wed Feb 27 11:09:56 CET 2019 > > Since raw_cpu_xchg() doesn't need to be IRQ-safe, like > this_cpu_xchg(), we can use a simple load-store instead of the cmpxchg > loop. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org> > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h | 18 +++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h > @@ -407,9 +407,21 @@ do { > \ > #define raw_cpu_or_1(pcp, val) percpu_to_op(, "or", (pcp), val) > #define raw_cpu_or_2(pcp, val) percpu_to_op(, "or", (pcp), val) > #define raw_cpu_or_4(pcp, val) percpu_to_op(, "or", (pcp), val) > -#define raw_cpu_xchg_1(pcp, val) percpu_xchg_op(, pcp, val) > -#define raw_cpu_xchg_2(pcp, val) percpu_xchg_op(, pcp, val) > -#define raw_cpu_xchg_4(pcp, val) percpu_xchg_op(, pcp, val) > + > +/* > + * raw_cpu_xchg() can use a load-store since it is not required to be > + * IRQ-safe. > + */ > +#define raw_percpu_xchg_op(var, nval) > \ > +({ \ > + typeof(var) pxo_ret__ = raw_cpu_read(var); \ > + raw_cpu_write(var, (nval)); \ > + pxo_ret__; \ > +}) > + > +#define raw_cpu_xchg_1(pcp, val) raw_percpu_xchg_op(pcp, val) > +#define raw_cpu_xchg_2(pcp, val) raw_percpu_xchg_op(pcp, val) > +#define raw_cpu_xchg_4(pcp, val) raw_percpu_xchg_op(pcp, val) > > #define this_cpu_read_1(pcp) percpu_from_op(volatile, "mov", pcp) > #define this_cpu_read_2(pcp) percpu_from_op(volatile, "mov", pcp)
And yes, I just added raw_cpu_xchg_8... *sigh*