On 30-01-19, 10:55, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 17-01-19, 14:16, Juri Lelli wrote: > > I was also wondering how this new framework is dealing with > > constraints/request imposed/generated by the scheduler and related > > interfaces (thinking about schedutil and Patrick's util_clamp). > > I am not very sure about what constraints are imposed by schedutil or > util-clamp stuff that may not work well with this stuff. > > As you are already aware of it, this series isn't doing anything new > as we already have thermal/user constraints available in kernel. I am > just trying to implement a better way to present those to the cpufreq > core.
@Juri: Ping. -- viresh
