On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:51:02AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > - if (timr->it_requeue_pending == info->si_sys_private) { > > > + if (timr->it_interval && timr->it_requeue_pending == > > > info->si_sys_private) { > > > timr->kclock->timer_rearm(timr); > > > > FWIW, with this patch the vanilla glibc 2.28 self tests > > rt/tst-cputimer1, rt/tst-cputimer2, and rt/tst-cputimer3 > > start to fail on s390: ... > > I haven't looked any further into this, just reporting.. otherwise the > > test systems seem to be healthy. > > Could you please check whether the top commit in tip:timers/urgent fixes > it: > 93ad0fc088c5: posix-cpu-timers: Unbreak timer rearming
Yes, the test cases don't fail anymore. Thanks! A general question: since I reported this already last year, was the bug report not usable? I understand that x-mas holidays were in between, just wondering if new "glibc test case" fails are worth to be reported like I did.
