Current implementation missed the case BCM590XX_REG_VSR, so
bcm590xx_get_enable_register() returns 0 when id is BCM590XX_REG_VSR.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel....@ingics.com>
---
Hi Matt,
Current code looks strange becasue bcm590xx_get_enable_register() returns 0
for BCM590XX_REG_VSR but there is a BCM590XX_VSRPMCTRL1 defined in the code.
I don't have the h/w, and I even cannot find the datasheet on the internet.
I might be wrong, but just in case this might fix a real bug.
Please help to review and test this patch.

Thanks,
Axel
 drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c 
b/drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c
index 92d6d7b10cf7..e49c0a7d5dd5 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/bcm590xx-regulator.c
@@ -242,8 +242,12 @@ static int bcm590xx_get_enable_register(int id)
                case BCM590XX_REG_SDSR2:
                        reg = BCM590XX_SDSR2PMCTRL1;
                        break;
+               case BCM590XX_REG_VSR:
+                       reg = BCM590XX_VSRPMCTRL1;
+                       break;
                case BCM590XX_REG_VBUS:
                        reg = BCM590XX_OTG_CTRL;
+                       break;
                }
 
 
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to