On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > Yes, the same `current' context must run the down/up pair of calls and as you > > said it is legal to rely on it on all the places it's used. > > I assume thats not an issue to reiserfs ? > I don't think so. There are two places reiserfs calls down/up. In our file->release() callback, and in the ioctl we added for lilo so it can upack files with tails. Neither calls copy_from/to_user or does an allocation other than GFP_BUFFER. As far as I know that should be safe, but the change is trivial if we need to make it. -chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18 thunder7
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18 Alan Cox
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18 J Sloan
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18 Alan Cox
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.1... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in ... Alan Cox
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in ... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in ... Alan Cox
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in ... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in ... Alan Cox
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in ... Chris Mason
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in ... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18 J . A . Magallon
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18 Mark Symonds
- Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18 Mark Symonds