> > I think Andrea just earned his official God status ;) > So, maybe his divine VM patches will make it into 2.2.19? The question is merely 'in what form' . I wanted to keep them seperate from the other large changes in 2.2.18 for obvious reasons. Andrea - can we have the core VM changes you did without adopting the change in semaphore semantics for file system locking which will give third party fs maintainers headaches and doesnt match 2.4 behaviour either ? Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- VM problems still in 2.2.18 Mark Symonds
- Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18 Alan Cox
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18 thunder7
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18 Alan Cox
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.1... J Sloan
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in ... Alan Cox
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems s... Alan Cox
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems s... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems s... Alan Cox
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems s... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems s... Alan Cox
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems s... Chris Mason
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems s... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.1... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.1... Mark Symonds