On 7/19/07, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: David Rientjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In acpi_scan_nodes(), we immediately return -1 if acpi_numa <= 0, meaning
we haven't detected any underlying ACPI topology or we have explicitly
disabled its use from the command-line with numa=noacpi.
acpi_table_print_srat_entry() and acpi_table_parse_srat() are only
referenced within drivers/acpi/numa.c, so we can mark them as static and
remove their prototypes from the header file.
Likewise, pxm_to_node_map[] and node_to_pxm_map[] are only used within
drivers/acpi/numa.c, so we mark them as static and remove their externs
from the header file.
The automatic 'result' variable is unused in acpi_numa_init(), so it's
removed.
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c | 6 +++---
drivers/acpi/numa.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
include/linux/acpi.h | 2 --
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Index: linux/arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c
+++ linux/arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c
/* maps to convert between proximity domain and logical node ID */
-static int pxm_to_node_map[MAX_PXM_DOMAINS]
+static int __cpuinitdata pxm_to_node_map[MAX_PXM_DOMAINS]
= { [0 ... MAX_PXM_DOMAINS - 1] = NID_INVAL };
-static int node_to_pxm_map[MAX_NUMNODES]
+static int __cpuinitdata node_to_pxm_map[MAX_NUMNODES]
= { [0 ... MAX_NUMNODES - 1] = PXM_INVAL };
do we need to put __initdata just before =?
YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
