On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 1:15 PM David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Depends on: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2018-October/001931.html > > Why we don't have HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS in arch/riscv/Kconfig? >
I looked this morning into Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.rst again. Of all the things the document describes we are only missing HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS in Kconfig, yet we already have it implemented in ptrace.c (+ this minor fix). Reading document, I think, we check all the boxes needed for HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS. I assume it was just missed (?) and will do v2 later on. david