4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ashish Samant <ashish.sam...@oracle.com>

commit cbe355f57c8074bc4f452e5b6e35509044c6fa23 upstream.

In dlm_init_lockres() we access and modify res->tracking and
dlm->tracking_list without holding dlm->track_lock.  This can cause list
corruptions and can end up in kernel panic.

Fix this by locking res->tracking and dlm->tracking_list with
dlm->track_lock instead of dlm->spinlock.

Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529951192-4686-1-git-send-email-ashish.sam...@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.sam...@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Changwei Ge <ge.chang...@h3c.com>
Acked-by: Joseph Qi <jiangqi...@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jun Piao <piao...@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <m...@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jl...@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao...@oracle.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <ge.chang...@h3c.com>
Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c
@@ -589,9 +589,9 @@ static void dlm_init_lockres(struct dlm_
 
        res->last_used = 0;
 
-       spin_lock(&dlm->spinlock);
+       spin_lock(&dlm->track_lock);
        list_add_tail(&res->tracking, &dlm->tracking_list);
-       spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock);
+       spin_unlock(&dlm->track_lock);
 
        memset(res->lvb, 0, DLM_LVB_LEN);
        memset(res->refmap, 0, sizeof(res->refmap));


Reply via email to