In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I placed the "fall through"
part at the beginning of the code comment, which is what GCC is
expecting to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114757 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gust...@embeddedor.com>
---
drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
index 594f72e..24bc5c5 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c
@@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static void xenkbd_backend_changed(struct xenbus_device
*dev,
case XenbusStateClosed:
if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed)
break;
- /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state -- fallthrough */
+ /* fall through - Missed the backend's CLOSING state */
case XenbusStateClosing:
xenbus_frontend_closed(dev);
break;
--
2.7.4
