On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 10:47:04AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > The comment is irrelevant as the remaining function is used for > > statistics in addition to the perf multiplier. It does exactly what the > > function name is. > > Which is my point. It shouldn't be dropped entirely, but updated IMO.
But the function name isn't the problem.. the problem that any use of the number is fundamentally broken.
