On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Half of the times when error_code and trap_nr are set are already in
s/when// I think
> do_trap_no_signal. Move the other time these are set into do_trap_no_signal,
Please write function as do_trap_no_signal() so it's more obvious what you
are talking about.
> and give do_trap_no_signal a single exit where a signals are sent.
s/a/// or s/a/all/ Not sure what you wanted to do here.
> After the move the comment documeting this all is much easier to follow
> as everything is together in one place.
>
> Also update the string that is passed in to const. The only user of that
> str is die and it already takes a const string, so this just makes it explicit
string
> that the string won't change.
>
> This prepares the way for adding a second caller to do_trap_no_signal.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebied...@xmission.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 29 ++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> index 31a689b67be3..f31c0ddee278 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ int fixup_bug(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
> }
>
> static nokprobe_inline int
> -do_trap_no_signal(struct task_struct *tsk, int trapnr, char *str,
> +do_trap_no_signal(struct task_struct *tsk, int trapnr, const char *str,
> struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
> {
> if (v8086_mode(regs)) {
> @@ -202,10 +202,8 @@ do_trap_no_signal(struct task_struct *tsk, int trapnr,
> char *str,
> error_code, trapnr))
> return 0;
> }
> - return -1;
> }
> -
> - if (!user_mode(regs)) {
> + else if (!user_mode(regs)) {
Please put that 'else if' right after the closing bracket, i.e.
} else if (...) {
> if (fixup_exception(regs, trapnr))
> return 0;
With that fixed:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
