From: Daniel Rosenberg <dro...@google.com>

[ Upstream commit 36b877af7992893b6d1ddbe96971cab5ab9e50eb ]

If we attempt to request more blocks than we have room for, we try to
instead request as much as we can, however, alloc_valid_block_count
is not decremented to match the new value, allowing it to drift higher
until the next checkpoint. This always decrements it when the requested
amount cannot be fulfilled.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <dro...@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index 34af21f46f2c..03c07721da49 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -1680,18 +1680,20 @@ static inline int inc_valid_block_count(struct 
f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
                sbi->total_valid_block_count -= diff;
                if (!*count) {
                        spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
-                       percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->alloc_valid_block_count, diff);
                        goto enospc;
                }
        }
        spin_unlock(&sbi->stat_lock);
 
-       if (unlikely(release))
+       if (unlikely(release)) {
+               percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->alloc_valid_block_count, release);
                dquot_release_reservation_block(inode, release);
+       }
        f2fs_i_blocks_write(inode, *count, true, true);
        return 0;
 
 enospc:
+       percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->alloc_valid_block_count, release);
        dquot_release_reservation_block(inode, release);
        return -ENOSPC;
 }
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to