In case of tty_ldisc_reinit() failure, tty->count should be decremented
back, otherwise we will never release_tty().
Never seen it in the real life, but it seems not really hard to hit.
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jsl...@suse.com>
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <d...@arista.com>
---
drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
index 32bc3e3fe4d3..5e5da9acaf0a 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
@@ -1255,6 +1255,7 @@ static void tty_driver_remove_tty(struct tty_driver
*driver, struct tty_struct *
static int tty_reopen(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
struct tty_driver *driver = tty->driver;
+ int retval;
if (driver->type == TTY_DRIVER_TYPE_PTY &&
driver->subtype == PTY_TYPE_MASTER)
@@ -1268,10 +1269,14 @@ static int tty_reopen(struct tty_struct *tty)
tty->count++;
- if (!tty->ldisc)
- return tty_ldisc_reinit(tty, tty->termios.c_line);
+ if (tty->ldisc)
+ return 0;
- return 0;
+ retval = tty_ldisc_reinit(tty, tty->termios.c_line);
+ if (retval)
+ tty->count--;
+
+ return retval;
}
/**
--
2.13.6
