4.17-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jann Horn <[email protected]>

commit a13f085d111e90469faf2d9965eb39b11c114d7e upstream.

This fixes the following issues:

- When a buffer size is supplied to reiserfs_listxattr() such that each
  individual name fits, but the concatenation of all names doesn't fit,
  reiserfs_listxattr() overflows the supplied buffer.  This leads to a
  kernel heap overflow (verified using KASAN) followed by an out-of-bounds
  usercopy and is therefore a security bug.

- When a buffer size is supplied to reiserfs_listxattr() such that a
  name doesn't fit, -ERANGE should be returned.  But reiserfs instead just
  truncates the list of names; I have verified that if the only xattr on a
  file has a longer name than the supplied buffer length, listxattr()
  incorrectly returns zero.

With my patch applied, -ERANGE is returned in both cases and the memory
corruption doesn't happen anymore.

Credit for making me clean this code up a bit goes to Al Viro, who pointed
out that the ->actor calling convention is suboptimal and should be
changed.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Fixes: 48b32a3553a5 ("reiserfs: use generic xattr handlers")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jeff Mahoney <[email protected]>
Cc: Eric Biggers <[email protected]>
Cc: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/xattr.c
@@ -792,8 +792,10 @@ static int listxattr_filler(struct dir_c
                        return 0;
                size = namelen + 1;
                if (b->buf) {
-                       if (size > b->size)
+                       if (b->pos + size > b->size) {
+                               b->pos = -ERANGE;
                                return -ERANGE;
+                       }
                        memcpy(b->buf + b->pos, name, namelen);
                        b->buf[b->pos + namelen] = 0;
                }


Reply via email to