On Tue, 2007-06-26 12:16:39 +0200, DervishD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Matthieu CASTET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit: > > On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:43:03 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > OTOH, you also didn't supply a patch. If you do this, I'll be glad to > > > consider it. If I can read it, that is. > > > > "s|/bin/sh|/bin/bash" is so hard to do ? > > Given that it happens too with "ldd", it really *is* that hard. I > don't know why still people think that /bin/sh is always /bin/bash. If > they want/need bash, that's ok to me, I will have it installed for such > tasks, but they should call it "#!/bin/bash".
...or "#!/usr/bin/env bash" for what it's worth... The same for plain
`sh'.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-172-7608481
Signature of: http://perl.plover.com/Questions.html
the second :
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
