Re: [PATCH] proc: add percpu populated pages count to meminfo

[Dennis Zhou]

Hi Tejun,

On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 08:11:46AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 02:12:06PM +0000, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> > > @@ -121,6 +122,7 @@ static int meminfo_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void 
> > > *v)
> > >              (unsigned long)VMALLOC_TOTAL >> 10);
> > >   show_val_kb(m, "VmallocUsed:    ", 0ul);
> > >   show_val_kb(m, "VmallocChunk:   ", 0ul);
> > > + show_val_kb(m, "PercpuPopulated:", pcpu_nr_populated_pages());
> > 
> > Populated? Can we avoid this for simplicities sake: "Percpu"?
> > 
> > We do not count pages that are not present elsewhere either and those
> > counters do not have "populated" in them.
> 
> Yeah, let's do "Percpu".
> 

Sounds good, I've dropped populated.

Thanks,
Dennis