On Friday, 22 June 2007 19:11, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > On 06/22/2007 11:00 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, 22 June 2007 00:34, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > >> On 06/21/2007 06:29 PM, Jesper Juhl wrote: > >>> I myself have argued that we should be focusing more on stability and > >>> regression fixing, but I'm not so sure that a 2.6.7 devel branch would > >>> solve this. In general the 2.6.x.y -stable kernels seem to be doing > >>> the job pretty good. > >>> > >> > >> Even the good ones that get lots of fixes aren't all that good. The > >> biggest problem ATM is that suspend is badly broken and keeps getting > >> worse... > > > > Can you please provide me with any links to suspend-related bug reports from > > you? > > > > I get so many suspend/resume bug reports that I've given up trying > to get them fixed. And there are so many bugs that are even worse, > like crashes during normal use, data corruption, etc. that suspend > bugs don't get much attention. But here are the ones for Fedora 6; > the list would be much longer if I included Fedora 5 and 7:
Can you please tell me what's the relationship between Fedora kernel vesions and the kernel.org kernels? Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
