On Tuesday 26 June 2007 13:59, Helge Hafting wrote: > Zoltán HUBERT wrote: > > Well, I'm using SuSE Pro 9.3 (excellent choice by the > > way), coming with kernel 2.6.10-SuSE > You either stick with SuSE 9.3 forever, or you > *try* something newer to see if it works,
I did. It (2.6.15) didn't. Between 2.6.10 and 2.6.15 the suspend API changed. It was documented that it would change and break things and so it did. Is that what "stable" is about ? > >> I don't think you'll find very > >> many people on this list who gives a damn about the > >> troubles of closed source driver developers. > > > > and what about their users ? > > Users of closed-source drivers get their support from > the closed-source vendor - not from the kernel > developers. It is that simple. Translated: "It's not my fault" > Again - this is how all operating systems works. kernel 2.0/2.1 ? Debian stable/testing/unstable ? FreeBSD 5.5/FreeBSD 6.2 ? > If your vendor don't want to support you anymore, try > getting the source. I was asking for a stable kernel, like 2.4, 2.2, 2.0 were before. 2.6 is not. It's a great kernel, better than that of MacOS X, I never said you were doing a bad job, quite the contrary. I wouldn't be using Linux since 10 years if I thought it stinks. I never asked support for closed source drivers, only a stable kernel. Whatever "stable" means. z -- ________________________ Zoltan ________________________ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
