On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 14:00:52 +0300 Kirill Tkhai <ktk...@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
> In case of shrink_slab_memcg() we do not zero nid, when shrinker > is not numa-aware. This is not a real problem, since currently > all memcg-aware shrinkers are numa-aware too (we have two: > super_block shrinker and workingset shrinker), but something may > change in the future. Fair enough. > (Andrew, this may be merged to > mm-iterate-only-over-charged-shrinkers-during-memcg-shrink_slab) It got a bit messy so I got lazy and queued it as a separate patch. btw, I have a note that https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/7/32 was caused by this patch series. Is that the case and do you know if this was addressed?
