On 02.08.2018 23:47, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 14:00:52 +0300 Kirill Tkhai <ktk...@virtuozzo.com> wrote: > >> In case of shrink_slab_memcg() we do not zero nid, when shrinker >> is not numa-aware. This is not a real problem, since currently >> all memcg-aware shrinkers are numa-aware too (we have two: >> super_block shrinker and workingset shrinker), but something may >> change in the future. > > Fair enough. > >> (Andrew, this may be merged to >> mm-iterate-only-over-charged-shrinkers-during-memcg-shrink_slab) > > It got a bit messy so I got lazy and queued it as a separate patch. > > btw, I have a note that https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/7/32 was caused by > this patch series. Is that the case and do you know if this was > addressed?
It's not related to the patchset. Bisect leads to: commit c6aeb9d4c351 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad) Author: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com> Date: Sun Jun 24 00:20:10 2018 +0100 kernfs, sysfs, cgroup, intel_rdt: Support fs_context CC David. David, please see reproducer at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/7/32 Kirill
