4.17-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Rob Herring <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 77dd4bd0c0db8e4856e7abc2192f126e226e14c5 ]

Single child nodes in OF graph don't need an address and now dtc will
warn about this:

Warning (graph_child_address): /soc/aips@50000000/ldb@53fa8008/lvds-channel@0: 
graph node has single child node 'port@0', #address-cells/#size-cells are not 
necessary

Since the LDB should always have an output port, fix the warning by
adding the output port, 2, to the DT.

Cc: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <[email protected]>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-ppd.dts |    2 --
 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi    |    8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-ppd.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-ppd.dts
@@ -559,8 +559,6 @@
                status = "okay";
 
                port@2 {
-                       reg = <2>;
-
                        lvds0_out: endpoint {
                                remote-endpoint = <&panel_in_lvds0>;
                        };
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi
@@ -488,6 +488,10 @@
                                                        remote-endpoint = 
<&ipu_di0_lvds0>;
                                                };
                                        };
+
+                                       port@2 {
+                                               reg = <2>;
+                                       };
                                };
 
                                lvds-channel@1 {
@@ -503,6 +507,10 @@
                                                        remote-endpoint = 
<&ipu_di1_lvds1>;
                                                };
                                        };
+
+                                       port@2 {
+                                               reg = <2>;
+                                       };
                                };
                        };
 


Reply via email to