4.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit a90a0884ac75f825157470a1c17e707d487bceb6 ]
This patch changes the rule to check cap_resource for data blocks, not inode
or node blocks in order to avoid selinux denial.
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -1602,7 +1602,7 @@ static inline bool f2fs_has_xattr_block(
}
static inline bool __allow_reserved_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
- struct inode *inode)
+ struct inode *inode, bool cap)
{
if (!inode)
return true;
@@ -1615,7 +1615,7 @@ static inline bool __allow_reserved_bloc
if (!gid_eq(F2FS_OPTION(sbi).s_resgid, GLOBAL_ROOT_GID) &&
in_group_p(F2FS_OPTION(sbi).s_resgid))
return true;
- if (capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
+ if (cap && capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
return true;
return false;
}
@@ -1650,7 +1650,7 @@ static inline int inc_valid_block_count(
avail_user_block_count = sbi->user_block_count -
sbi->current_reserved_blocks;
- if (!__allow_reserved_blocks(sbi, inode))
+ if (!__allow_reserved_blocks(sbi, inode, true))
avail_user_block_count -= F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks;
if (unlikely(sbi->total_valid_block_count > avail_user_block_count)) {
@@ -1857,7 +1857,7 @@ static inline int inc_valid_node_count(s
valid_block_count = sbi->total_valid_block_count +
sbi->current_reserved_blocks + 1;
- if (!__allow_reserved_blocks(sbi, inode))
+ if (!__allow_reserved_blocks(sbi, inode, false))
valid_block_count += F2FS_OPTION(sbi).root_reserved_blocks;
if (unlikely(valid_block_count > sbi->user_block_count)) {
