On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Andreas Kemnade <andr...@kemnade.info> wrote: > Hi, > > I just stumbled upon our defconfigs. > > andi@aktux:~/gta04/gta04-kernel$ ls -l arch/arm/configs/ -Sr | tail -n > 10 -rw-r--r-- 1 andi andi 9524 Apr 7 14:53 imote2_defconfig > -rw-r--r-- 1 andi andi 9985 Jul 28 13:34 imx_v6_v7_defconfig > -rw-r--r-- 1 andi andi 10118 Apr 7 14:53 ezx_defconfig > -rw-r--r-- 1 andi andi 10665 Apr 7 14:53 s3c2410_defconfig > -rw-r--r-- 1 andi andi 13161 May 29 18:14 omap2plus_defconfig > -rw-r--r-- 1 andi andi 17834 May 29 18:14 pxa_defconfig > -rw-r--r-- 1 andi andi 24624 Jul 28 13:34 multi_v7_defconfig > -rw-r--r-- 1 andi andi 157222 Jul 28 13:34 letux_udoo_defconfig > -rw-r--r-- 1 andi andi 157271 Jul 28 13:34 letux_lpae_defconfig > -rw-r--r-- 1 andi andi 157352 Jul 28 13:34 letux_defconfig > > > So we are bloated somehow. So I am wondering how these defconfigs are created. > AFAIK the tool is > > make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=... savedefconfig > > the file can then be used as a defconfig. I just did it and copied it over to > .config and used > make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=... olddefconfig > > The result is the same. But the defconfig created by savedefconfig is only > 20KB. > Well, what is the advantage? We have a better overview where we have > non-default values.
So, why not to send patches? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
