On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:00:04 +0200
Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@bootlin.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:15:22PM +0200, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> > The SID controller on H5 look the same as the one present in the A64.
> > But in case we find some difference one day at a compatible string
> > of it's own and a fallback to the A64 one.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Vadot <m...@freebsd.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi
> > index 62d646baac3c..28183bf77164 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h5.dtsi
> > @@ -129,3 +129,8 @@
> > <GIC_SPI 23 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-pinctrl";
> > };
> > +
> > +&sid {
> > + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-sid",
> > + "allwinner,sun50i-a64-sid";
> > +};
>
> This is still a bit pointless, please remove the common node.
You mean directly declare sid controller in the SoC dtsi and not have
a common node in sunxi-h3-h5.dtsi ?
> Maxime
>
> --
> Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
--
Emmanuel Vadot <m...@bidouilliste.com> <m...@freebsd.org>
