On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 14:39:34 -0500 "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gust...@embeddedor.com> wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gust...@embeddedor.com> Looks like a bug to me not an unmarked fall through. Should be return ret; Do you want to do the patch? Thanks, Jonathan > --- > drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c b/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c > index 4dceb75..209b52a 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/sca3000.c > @@ -797,6 +797,7 @@ static int sca3000_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, > mutex_lock(&st->lock); > ret = sca3000_write_3db_freq(st, val); > mutex_unlock(&st->lock); > + /* fall through */ > default: > return -EINVAL; > }
