On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:44:47 +1200
Chris Packham <chris.pack...@alliedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:

> Micron MT29F1G08ABAFAWP-ITE:F supports an on-die ECC with 8 bits
> per 512 bytes. Add support for this combination.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.pack...@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@bootlin.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - New
> Changes in v3:
> - Handle reporting of corrected errors that don't require a rewrite, expand
>   comment for the ECC status bits.
> Changes in v4:
> - Use a switch statement for handling ECC status
> - Update ecc_stats.corrected
> Changes in v5:
> - Move status checking to different routines for 4/512 and 8/512 assume
>   the highest number of bit flips for a given status value.
> Changes in v6:
> - Add review from Boris
> 
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c 
> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> index d30bd4df9b12..f83053562925 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_micron.c
> @@ -18,10 +18,30 @@
>  #include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h>
>  
>  /*
> - * Special Micron status bit that indicates when the block has been
> - * corrected by on-die ECC and should be rewritten
> + * Special Micron status bit 3 indicates that the block has been
> + * corrected by on-die ECC and should be rewritten.
>   */
> -#define NAND_STATUS_WRITE_RECOMMENDED        BIT(3)
> +#define NAND_ECC_STATUS_WRITE_RECOMMENDED    BIT(3)
> +
> +/*
> + * On chips with 8-bit ECC and additional bit can be used to distinguish
> + * cases where a errors were corrected without needing a rewrite
> + *
> + * Bit 4 Bit 3 Bit 0 Description
> + * ----- ----- ----- -----------
> + * 0     0     0     No Errors
> + * 0     0     1     Multiple uncorrected errors
> + * 0     1     0     4 - 6 errors corrected, recommend rewrite
> + * 0     1     1     Reserved
> + * 1     0     0     1 - 3 errors corrected
> + * 1     0     1     Reserved
> + * 1     1     0     7 - 8 errors corrected, recommend rewrite
> + */
> +#define NAND_ECC_STATUS_MASK         (BIT(4) | BIT(3) | BIT(0))
> +#define NAND_ECC_STATUS_UNCORRECTABLE        BIT(0)
> +#define NAND_ECC_STATUS_4_6_CORRECTED        BIT(3)
> +#define NAND_ECC_STATUS_1_3_CORRECTED        BIT(4)
> +#define NAND_ECC_STATUS_7_8_CORRECTED        (BIT(4) | BIT(3))
>  
>  struct nand_onfi_vendor_micron {
>       u8 two_plane_read;
> @@ -113,6 +133,54 @@ static int micron_nand_on_die_ecc_setup(struct nand_chip 
> *chip, bool enable)
>       return nand_set_features(chip, ONFI_FEATURE_ON_DIE_ECC, feature);
>  }
>  
> +
> +static int micron_nand_on_die_ecc_status_4(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> +                                        struct nand_chip *chip, u8 status)
> +{
> +     /*
> +      * The internal ECC doesn't tell us the number of bitflips
> +      * that have been corrected, but tells us if it recommends to
> +      * rewrite the block. If it's the case, then we pretend we had
> +      * a number of bitflips equal to the ECC strength, which will
> +      * hint the NAND core to rewrite the block.
> +      */
> +     if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) {
> +             mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> +     } else if (status & NAND_ECC_STATUS_WRITE_RECOMMENDED) {
> +             mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += chip->ecc.strength;
> +             return chip->ecc.strength;
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int micron_nand_on_die_ecc_status_8(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> +                                        struct nand_chip *chip, u8 status)
> +{
> +     /*
> +      * With 8/512 we have more information but still don't know precisely
> +      * how many bit-flips were seen.
> +      */
> +     switch (status & NAND_ECC_STATUS_MASK) {
> +     case NAND_ECC_STATUS_UNCORRECTABLE:
> +             mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> +             return 0;
> +     case NAND_ECC_STATUS_1_3_CORRECTED:
> +             mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += 3;
> +             return 3;
> +     case NAND_ECC_STATUS_4_6_CORRECTED:
> +             mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += 6;
> +             /* rewrite recommended */
> +             return 6;
> +     case NAND_ECC_STATUS_7_8_CORRECTED:
> +             mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += 8;
> +             /* rewrite recommended */
> +             return 8;
> +     default:
> +             return 0;
> +     }
> +}
> +
>  static int
>  micron_nand_read_page_on_die_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip 
> *chip,
>                                uint8_t *buf, int oob_required,
> @@ -137,19 +205,10 @@ micron_nand_read_page_on_die_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, 
> struct nand_chip *chip,
>       if (ret)
>               goto out;
>  
> -     if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) {
> -             mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> -     } else if (status & NAND_STATUS_WRITE_RECOMMENDED) {
> -             /*
> -              * The internal ECC doesn't tell us the number of bitflips
> -              * that have been corrected, but tells us if it recommends to
> -              * rewrite the block. If it's the case, then we pretend we had
> -              * a number of bitflips equal to the ECC strength, which will
> -              * hint the NAND core to rewrite the block.
> -              */
> -             mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += chip->ecc.strength;
> -             max_bitflips = chip->ecc.strength;
> -     }
> +     if (chip->ecc.strength == 4)
> +             max_bitflips = micron_nand_on_die_ecc_status_4(mtd, chip, 
> status);
> +     else
> +             max_bitflips = micron_nand_on_die_ecc_status_8(mtd, chip, 
> status);
>  
>       ret = nand_read_data_op(chip, buf, mtd->writesize, false);
>       if (!ret && oob_required)
> @@ -240,10 +299,9 @@ static int micron_supports_on_die_ecc(struct nand_chip 
> *chip)
>               return MICRON_ON_DIE_MANDATORY;
>  
>       /*
> -      * Some Micron NANDs have an on-die ECC of 4/512, some other
> -      * 8/512. We only support the former.
> +      * We only support on-die ECC of 4/512 or 8/512
>        */
> -     if (chip->ecc_strength_ds != 4)
> +     if  (chip->ecc_strength_ds != 4 && chip->ecc_strength_ds != 8)
>               return MICRON_ON_DIE_UNSUPPORTED;
>  
>       return MICRON_ON_DIE_SUPPORTED;
> @@ -275,9 +333,9 @@ static int micron_nand_init(struct nand_chip *chip)
>                       return -EINVAL;
>               }
>  
> -             chip->ecc.bytes = 8;
> +             chip->ecc.bytes = chip->ecc_strength_ds * 2;

Just had a quick look at the MT29F1G08ABAFAWP datasheet, and the layout
is different: you have all ECC bytes placed at the end of OOB area (64
bytes), and all the free bytes placed at the beginning (64 bytes). You
should define a new mtd_ooblayout_ops for this case.

>               chip->ecc.size = 512;
> -             chip->ecc.strength = 4;
> +             chip->ecc.strength = chip->ecc_strength_ds;
>               chip->ecc.algo = NAND_ECC_BCH;
>               chip->ecc.read_page = micron_nand_read_page_on_die_ecc;
>               chip->ecc.write_page = micron_nand_write_page_on_die_ecc;

Reply via email to