Hi David, On Monday 02 July 2018 09:02 PM, David Lechner wrote: > On 07/02/2018 07:28 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> Hi David, Stephen, >> >> On Thursday 28 June 2018 03:27 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszew...@baylibre.com> >>> >>> This series moves all aemif/nand users to using the ti-aemif platform >>> driver located in drivers/memory instead of the older API located in >>> mach-davinci. >>> >>> First five patches add necessary changes to the clock driver. Next >>> seven convert the board files to using the ti-aemif driver. Last patch >>> removes now dead code. >> >> How do you want to handle this series? I can apply the series and >> provide you an immutable branch on v4.18-rc1 with the clock patches >> applied if that can work. > > Sounds good to me. But I'm new to this maintainer thing, so maybe > there is something to consider that I haven't thought of?
I don't think there is more to it. Ultimately there should not be two commits for the same patch. Either you can apply and share the commit to use or I can do that as well. I am equally fine either way. Regards, Sekhar
